Jonty Giesen vs Mustafa Ege Sik Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 03:55 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Giesen vs M. Ege Sik

NZL
1
Win
Played
0
Win

TUR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Giesen 1 - 0 Sik
They have played 3 sets in total, with Jonty Giesen winning 2 and Mustafa Ege Sik winning 1. The last match between Jonty Giesen and Mustafa Ege Sik was at the M15 Brisbane, 12-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Jonty Giesen getting the victory 6-4 1-6 14-12.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Giesen | 1 |
| Sik | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Brisbane(08-12-25)
J. Giesen vs M. E. Sik H2H Profile
J. Giesen vs M. E. Sik Match Preview:
- Sik has demonstrated superior recent form in second serve points, winning 42.22%, while Giesen has won none. What does this imply for match outcomes? It strongly suggests Sik has an advantage.
- In return games, Sik excels, seizing 38.82% of second serve points from opponents, compared to Giesen's 0%. Could this indicate Sik's defensive strength? Clearly, yes.
- Facing breakpoints, Sik has shown resilience, saving 61.29%, whereas Giesen hasn't saved any. Under pressure, Sik seems to hold an upper hand.
- Overall match success over the past year shows Sik winning 77.78% of matches, while Giesen manages 40%, highlighting a significant discrepancy in performance.
- When comparing surface proficiency, both players favor Hard courts, but Sik's unblemished history there further underscores their edge.
- Anticipating any tight contests, Sik boasts a perfect track record in deciding sets recently, contrasting Giesen's lack of success.
- Break point conversion is crucial, with Sik currently converting 22.22% of opportunities, whereas Giesen has yet to make a mark.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
As we approach this upcoming tennis match, the statistics highlight distinct advantages for Sik. Their recent performance on second serves and return games sets them apart from Giesen, who has struggled to secure points in these critical areas. This advantage often correlates with victory in similar matches.
Moreover, Sik's ability to convert breakpoints and save against them, demonstrated through recent past performances, suggests a propensity to thrive under pressure. Their remarkable success in deciding sets further solidifies their credibility as a formidable competitor.
Taking the above factors into account, combined with Sik's superior win rate over the past year across competitive levels, they clearly appear to have the upper hand against Giesen. Thus, Sik is the likely favorite to win this upcoming match.
Jonty Giesen vs Mustafa Ege Sik Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Giesen vs M. E. Sik H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 21 | Games Won | 22 |
| 8 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:31:29 | Average Match Time | 1:31:29 |
| 51% (28/55) | 1st Serve % | 69% (50/72) |
| 71% (20/28) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (31/50) |
| 59% (16/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 64% (14/22) |
| 33% (1/3) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 38% (27/72) | Return Points Win % | 35% (19/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Giesen Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q3 | W | 6-4 1-6 14-12 | ||
Q2 | W | 6-4 6-3 | ||
Q1 | W | 6-3 6-2 | ||
Q1 | L | 6-3 3-6 10-6 | ||
M. E. Sik Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 1-6 6-2 7-6(7) | ||
Q3 | L | 6-7(5) 6-3 10-8 | ||
Q2 | W | w/o | ||
R2 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 7-6(3) 6-3 | ||

J. Giesen vs M. E. Sik Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 40.00% (4/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 44.00% (11/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.11% (33/21) |
| 46.86% (127/144) | Games Win/Loss | 52.11% (309/284) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Hard Win/Loss | 60.00% (9/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 75.00% (6/2) |
| 0.11 | Aces Per Game | 0.21 |
| 15 | Aces Total | 62 |
| 0.09 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.26 |
| 12 | Total Double Faults | 76 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:11:58 |
| 246.6 | Average Opponent Rank | 243.57 |
| 51% (87/169) | 1st Serve % | 60% (706/1170) |
| 67% (58/87) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (469/706) |
| 50% (41/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (226/464) |
| 33% (3/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (36/86) |
| 36% (67/188) | Return Points Win % | 38% (375/992) |
| 40.00% (4/6) | Futures W/L | 65.22% (15/8) |
| 40% (4/10) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 65% (15/23) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 77% (10/13) |
| 40% (2/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 60% (5/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (14/12) |
| 40% (5/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (14/2) |
| 20% (5/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 33% (9/3) |